Was Amasa’s father Ithra the Israelite or Jether the Ishmaelite?
Hard question · Genealogies · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Absalom’s commander Amasa was the son of “Ithra an Israelite” (KJV; the BSB reads “Ithra, the Ishmaelite”), who went in to Abigail, sister of Zeruiah, Joab’s mother.
And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab’s mother.
“And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.”
And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.
The objection
2 Samuel 17:25 says that Amasa’s father was “Ithra an Israelite”. 1 Chronicles 2:17 says that he was “Jether the Ishmeelite”. Critics say the two books disagree about both his name and his nation.
The answer
The name is the same in both. Ithra (Hebrew Yitra) and Jether (Yeter) are two forms of one name; a similar pair is used of Moses’ father-in-law, who is Yeter and then Yitro in a single verse (Exodus 4:18, where the KJV has Jethro both times). Both passages also name the same mother, Abigail, the sister of Zeruiah (and, by 1 Chronicles 2:16, of David), so they plainly mean the same man.
The nation needs more explaining, and two answers are given. Keil and Delitzsch point out that there was no reason for Samuel to say that Amasa’s father was an Israelite, since nearly everyone in the story was; it is worth saying only if he was not. They conclude that ‘Israelite’ is a copyist’s slip for ‘Ishmaelite’, two Hebrew words with several letters in common (see textual), and that Chronicles preserves the original. John Gill, with the Jewish commentators Rashi (Jarchi) and Kimchi, suggested instead that both words are true: Jether was an Ishmaelite by birth who had joined Israel, or an Israelite who had lived among the Ishmaelites. David’s own servants included “Obil the Ishmaelite” (1 Chronicles 27:30), and a man could be named from the place he had lived, as “Obed–edom the Gittite” was (2 Samuel 6:10). Either way the two verses describe one man.
From the classic commentators
either because he was an Ishmaelite by birth, and being proselyted to the Jewish religion, was called an Israelite; or rather he was an Israelite by birth, and having sojourned in the land of Ishmael some time, was called an IshmaeliteJohn Gill, Exposition of the Bible, on 2 Samuel 17:25 (1746–1763)
Sources
- Keil and Delitzsch, Commentary on 2 Samuel 17, at Bible Hub
- Keil and Delitzsch, Commentary on 1 Chronicles 2, at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 2 Samuel 17, at Bible Hub
- Brenton’s English Septuagint (1851): 2 Samuel 17, at eBible.org
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 1 Chronicles 2, at Bible Hub