Did Asa take away the high places or not?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Asa took away “the altars of the strange gods, and the high places”, broke the images, cut down the groves, and removed the high places from all the cities of Judah.
For he took away the altars of the strange gods, and the high places, and brake down the images, and cut down the groves: And commanded Judah to seek the Lord God of their fathers, and to do the law and the commandment. Also he took away out of all the cities of Judah the high places and the images: and the kingdom was quiet before him.
“But the high places were not removed: nevertheless Asa’s heart was perfect with the Lord all his days.”
But the high places were not removed: nevertheless Asa’s heart was perfect with the Lord all his days.
“But the high places were not taken away out of Israel: nevertheless the heart of Asa was perfect all his days.”
But the high places were not taken away out of Israel: nevertheless the heart of Asa was perfect all his days.
The objection
2 Chronicles 14:3–5 says that Asa took away the high places from all the cities of Judah. Yet 1 Kings 15:14 says that “the high places were not removed”, and Chronicles itself, a chapter later, says that “the high places were not taken away out of Israel” (2 Chronicles 15:17). Critics ask which is true.
The answer
The Chronicler wrote both statements, a chapter apart, and plainly did not think they clashed. Two explanations are given, and they can stand together. First, the high places (Hebrew bamot) were of two kinds. Some were shrines of foreign gods. In 2 Chronicles 14:3 the high places Asa removed stand beside “the altars of the strange gods”, the images and the Asherah poles (the ‘groves’ of the KJV): this was his attack on idolatry. Others were local altars where the people still sacrificed to the Lord himself, against the law that sacrifice was to be offered only at the place God chose (Deuteronomy 12:13–14). The note that the high places remained sits beside the statement that Asa’s heart was wholly the Lord’s, which suits this second kind. Gill reads it so, and Haley cites several scholars who take the same view. Keil and Delitzsch rejected this distinction, because the high places that Jehoshaphat removed (2 Chronicles 17:6) cannot, they argued, have been only idolatrous ones.
Second, a king’s order is not the same as the people’s practice. Keil and Delitzsch, Barnes’ Notes and Ellicott think that Asa did set out to abolish the high places but could not carry the reform through. The people clung to their local shrines, and some were rebuilt. On this view 2 Chronicles 14 describes what the king did and intended, and 15:17 what still remained among the people. The same pattern appears with his son Jehoshaphat (2 Chronicles 17:6; 20:33; see the question on Jehoshaphat and the high places). A reform from the top that did not reach everyone, or did not last, can truly be described both ways.
Other answers Christians give
Different times in his reign
Rawlinson, cited by Haley, suggested that the passages refer to different times. Asa put down the high places early in his reign, but in his later years, when his faith had cooled (2 Chronicles 16), they crept back.
Still open
What ‘out of Israel’ in 2 Chronicles 15:17 means is uncertain. Ellicott takes it as Asa’s own kingdom of Judah; some have taken it as the northern kingdom or the towns Asa had captured from it (15:8), though the Pulpit Commentary thinks this unlikely. Chronicles does not say in so many words which high places were removed and which remained.
From the classic commentators
Bahr, Thenius, Bertheau, and others say that the high places dedicated to idols were destroyed; while those dedicated to Jehovah were allowed to remain, since his true servants, having been long accustomed to them, might have been grieved by their removal. Keil thinks that the second text merely implies that the king did not succeed in carrying out thoroughly his reforms.J. W. Haley, Alleged Discrepancies (1874), p. 323
Sources
- J. W. Haley, Alleged Discrepancies (1874), p. 323 (Asa and the high places)
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament: 1 Kings 15, at Bible Hub
- Barnes’ Notes on the Bible: 2 Chronicles 15, at Bible Hub
- Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers: 2 Chronicles 15, at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 1 Kings 15 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub