Bible Synapse

Was David’s second son, born in Hebron, called Chileab or Daniel?

Hard question · Genealogies · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate

Different people, or one person with two names
See the passages joined in the interactive map

The passages

2 Samuel 3:2–5

David’s six sons born in Hebron: Amnon, Chileab “of Abigail the wife of Nabal the Carmelite”, Absalom, Adonijah, Shephatiah and Ithream.

And unto David were sons born in Hebron: and his firstborn was Amnon, of Ahinoam the Jezreelitess; And his second, Chileab, of Abigail the wife of Nabal the Carmelite; and the third, Absalom the son of Maacah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur; And the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; and the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital; And the sixth, Ithream, by Eglah David’s wife. These were born to David in Hebron.

1 Chronicles 3:1–4

The same six sons, in the same order and with the same mothers, but the second is “Daniel, of Abigail the Carmelitess”.

Now these were the sons of David, which were born unto him in Hebron; the firstborn Amnon, of Ahinoam the Jezreelitess; the second Daniel, of Abigail the Carmelitess: The third, Absalom the son of Maachah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur: the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith: The fifth, Shephatiah of Abital: the sixth, Ithream by Eglah his wife. These six were born unto him in Hebron; and there he reigned seven years and six months: and in Jerusalem he reigned thirty and three years.

The objection

2 Samuel 3:3 says that David’s second son, born in Hebron to Abigail, was Chileab. 1 Chronicles 3:1, listing the same six sons in the same order, calls Abigail’s son Daniel. Critics ask which name is right.

The answer

Both lists plainly mean the same son: in each he is David’s second son, born in Hebron, and his mother is Abigail of Carmel, Nabal’s widow. Only the name differs, and the simplest explanation, given by Keil and Delitzsch, is that he had two names. That was common in Israel. Gideon was also called Jerubbaal (Judges 6:32; 7:1), Solomon was also named Jedidiah (2 Samuel 12:24–25), and King Uzziah was also Azariah (2 Kings 15:1, 13). The other five sons have the same names and mothers in both lists, so the writer of Chronicles was not careless; he gives this son a name he knew him by.

The names may even tell us why there were two. Daniel means ‘God is my judge’, and John Gill suggested that David gave it in thanks that God had judged his cause against Nabal (1 Samuel 25:39). Chileab is of uncertain meaning, and Jewish tradition explained it as ‘like his father’. This son is not mentioned again, even in the later struggles over the succession, perhaps because he died young.

Other answers Christians give

A copyist’s slip

Some scholars, among them the writer of the article ‘Chileab’ in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, think that the name in Samuel was damaged in copying (see textual). On this view Daniel is the son’s true name, and Chronicles preserves it. Keil and Delitzsch thought a copyist’s error unlikely, as the two names are too different.

From the classic commentators

a difference which cannot well have arisen through an error of a copyist, but is probably to be explained on the supposition that this son had two different namesC. F. Keil and F. Delitzsch, Commentary on 1 Chronicles 3:1 (1866–1891)

Sources

Raised by: The Skeptic’s Annotated Bible. Only the verse references come from these lists.

Checked 2026-10-22. All hard questions