Did Jesus free one man from demons in the country of the Gadarenes, or two?
Hard question · The life of Jesus · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
In the country of the Gergesenes “there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce”.
And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way.
In the country of the Gadarenes “there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit”.
And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,
In the country of the Gadarenes “there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time”.
And they arrived at the country of the Gadarenes, which is over against Galilee. And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs.
The objection
Matthew says that two demon-possessed men met Jesus when he crossed the lake. Mark and Luke tell the same story, with the same tombs, the same herd of swine and the same frightened townspeople, but they speak of only one man. Critics ask how many there were.
The answer
Neither Mark nor Luke says that there was only one man, and naming one person who was present does not deny that another was there. Mark and Luke follow the man who stood out: the fiercer of the two, perhaps, as Barnes suggests, or the better known, whose case, Augustine thought, had grieved the whole district. He is the one who speaks for the demons and gives the name ‘Legion’, the one later seen sitting “clothed, and in his right mind” (Mark 5:15), and the one who begged to go with Jesus and was sent home instead, to tell what the Lord had done for him (Mark 5:18–20; Luke 8:38–39). Because his story went on, as he preached through the Decapolis, it was natural for Mark and Luke to centre their accounts on him.
Matthew, whose account is the shortest of the three, mentions both men, as he does with the two blind men at Jericho (Matthew 20:30), where Mark names only Bartimaeus. This is how independent witnesses commonly speak. As Barnes says, if Mark and Luke had plainly denied that there was more than one, while Matthew said two, there would be a real contradiction; they do not.
Still open
The Gospels and their manuscripts name the district in different ways (the country of the Gadarenes, Gerasenes or Gergesenes). Which town the name refers to, and where on the eastern shore of the lake the event took place, is a separate question.
From the classic commentators
we may suppose that one of these parties was a person of some kind of superior notability and repute, whose case was particularly lamented by that district, and for whose deliverance there was special anxiety.Augustine, The Harmony of the Gospels, Book II, chapter 24 (about 400), tr. S. D. F. Salmond (1888)
It is to be observed, however, that neither Mark nor Luke say that there was no more than one. For particular reasons, they might have been led to fix their attention on the one that was more notorious, and furious, and difficult to be managed.Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on Matthew 8:28 (1832)
Sources
- Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Matthew 8 (1832), at Bible Hub
- Augustine, The Harmony of the Gospels, Book II, chapter 24, at New Advent