Did David kill Goliath with his sling or with a sword?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
David’s stone sank into the giant’s forehead and he fell; “So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone”, and “there was no sword in the hand of David”.
And David put his hand in his bag, and took thence a stone, and slang it, and smote the Philistine in his forehead, that the stone sunk into his forehead; and he fell upon his face to the earth. So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David.
David ran, stood over the Philistine, drew the giant’s own sword “and slew him, and cut off his head therewith”.
Therefore David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith. And when the Philistines saw their champion was dead, they fled.
The objection
Verse 50 says that David overcame Goliath with a sling and a stone, struck him and killed him, though he had no sword in his hand. The very next verse says David took Goliath’s sword and killed him with it. Critics ask which killed Goliath, the stone or the sword.
The answer
Verse 50 sums up the fight; verse 51 then tells how it ended. Hebrew narrative often states the result first and then gives the details, and Keil and Delitzsch read verse 50 in just this way, as the writer’s remark on the outcome. Its point is the contrast the whole chapter has built up: Goliath came “with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield”, and David “in the name of the Lord of hosts” (1 Samuel 17:45). David won that contest without a sword of his own.
Verse 51 shows how the victory was completed. The stone felled the giant, who “fell upon his face to the earth” (17:49), but he was not necessarily dead. So David ran, stood over him and finished him with his own sword. The Hebrew marks the difference. Verse 50 uses vaymitehu, the ordinary ‘and he killed him’ (Hiphil of muth, Strong’s H4191). Verse 51 uses vaymotetehu, a stronger form (the Polel) which the Brown–Driver–Briggs lexicon glosses ‘kill, put to death, despatch’. Among other places, it is used for finishing off wounded men: Abimelech asking his armour-bearer to kill him (Judges 9:54), Jonathan’s armour-bearer dispatching the Philistines his master had struck down (1 Samuel 14:13), and the Amalekite’s claim about Saul, “I stood upon him, and slew him” (2 Samuel 1:10). The stone brought Goliath down and the sword ended his life, so both verses are true of the one fight.
From the classic commentators
smote him with the stone, which brought him to the ground, and then slew him with his own sword, as afterwards relatedJohn Gill, Exposition of the Bible, on 1 Samuel 17 (1746–1763)
Sources
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on 1 Samuel 17, at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 1 Samuel 17 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- Brown–Driver–Briggs Hebrew Lexicon: muth (Strong’s H4191), at Bible Hub