Were five or seven of the king’s advisers taken from Jerusalem?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
The captain of the guard took the chief priests and doorkeepers, an officer over the soldiers, “and five men of them that were in the king’s presence”.
And the captain of the guard took Seraiah the chief priest, and Zephaniah the second priest, and the three keepers of the door: And out of the city he took an officer that was set over the men of war, and five men of them that were in the king’s presence, which were found in the city, and the principal scribe of the host, which mustered the people of the land, and threescore men of the people of the land that were found in the city:
The same list, word for word, except that it has “seven men of them that were near the king’s person”.
And the captain of the guard took Seraiah the chief priest, and Zephaniah the second priest, and the three keepers of the door: He took also out of the city an eunuch, which had the charge of the men of war; and seven men of them that were near the king’s person, which were found in the city; and the principal scribe of the host, who mustered the people of the land; and threescore men of the people of the land, that were found in the midst of the city.
The objection
When Jerusalem fell, Nebuzaradan took a group of its leading men to Nebuchadnezzar at Riblah, where they were put to death. 2 Kings 25:19 says that among them were five of the men who were in the king’s presence; Jeremiah 52:25, in an otherwise identical list, says seven. The two accounts give different numbers for the same men.
The answer
As with the day of Jehoiachin’s release in the same chapter, Jeremiah 52 here repeats the account of 2 Kings 25 almost word for word. Both list Seraiah the chief priest, Zephaniah the second priest, three doorkeepers, an officer over the soldiers, the king’s advisers, the army’s scribe, and sixty men of the people. Everything matches except the one number. That points to a slip in the copying of one book, not to two writers with different information.
The men in question are described in Hebrew as those ‘who saw the king’s face’: his closest counsellors, with the right of entry to him. Esther uses the same phrase of the Persian king’s inner council: “the seven princes of Persia and Media, which saw the king’s face” (Esther 1:14). Whether five or seven of them were caught, the point of both passages is the same. Those who had led Judah’s resistance were singled out and executed, and so “Judah was carried away captive out of his own land” (Jeremiah 52:27).
Keil and Delitzsch list this among the numeral differences in the chapter which they explain by the confusion of similar numeral signs (with the height of the capitals, the day the temple was burned and the day of Jehoiachin’s release). Ellicott thought that ‘five’ was original, and that the sign for 5 had been partly worn away in the copy used for Jeremiah 52.
Other answers Christians give
Two more men found later
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown suggest that five were taken at first and two more found afterwards, and Gill, following the medieval Jewish commentator Rashi (Jarchi), that two of the seven were of lower rank and so not counted in Kings. These are possible, but the two lists are otherwise identical, which makes a simple copying slip more likely.
Counting the officers in
Adam Clarke wondered whether Jeremiah counted the officer over the soldiers and the army’s scribe with the five, to make seven. Jeremiah, however, lists those two men separately as well, so this does not fit the text well.
Still open
Which number is original cannot now be settled. The early translations divide along the lines of the books: Kings has five in the Greek, Syriac and Latin, and Jeremiah has seven.
From the classic commentators
five men of them that were in the king's presence--that is, who belonged to the royal retinue. It is probable that there were five at first, and that other two were found afterwards (Jer 52:25).Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary on 2 Kings 25:19 (1871)
Sources
- Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers: 2 Kings 25 (the readings of the versions), at Bible Hub
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament: 2 Kings 25 (1857–78), at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: Jeremiah 52 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible: 2 Kings 25 (1810–1826), at Bible Hub