Did David pay a hundred Philistine foreskins for Michal, or two hundred?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Saul asked no dowry “but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines”; David killed two hundred and handed over their foreskins “in full tale to the king”.
And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king’s enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king’s son in law: and the days were not expired. Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king’s son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.
David demands from Ish-bosheth “my wife Michal, which I espoused to me for an hundred foreskins of the Philistines”.
And David sent messengers to Ish–bosheth Saul’s son, saying, Deliver me my wife Michal, which I espoused to me for an hundred foreskins of the Philistines.
The objection
1 Samuel 18:27 says that David killed two hundred Philistines and gave their foreskins to Saul as the price of Michal. In 2 Samuel 3:14 David himself says he betrothed Michal for a hundred. Critics ask which number is right.
The answer
Both numbers are right, because they answer different questions. A hundred was the price Saul set: “The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines” (1 Samuel 18:25). Saul hoped that David would be killed trying to pay it. David brought double. He killed two hundred men and handed over their foreskins “in full tale”, that is, in full number, so that no one could say the price had not been met (18:27).
Years later, when David demanded his wife back from Saul’s son Ish-bosheth, he was stating a legal claim. He named the bride-price that had been agreed for Michal, the hundred foreskins Saul had required, because that was what made her his lawful wife and bound Saul’s house to its side of the bargain (2 Samuel 3:14). The second hundred had been a gift beyond the terms, and there was no reason to mention it. Gill and Ellicott both explain the verse this way: a hundred was required, two hundred were given, and only the required number is named.
Other answers Christians give
A hundred in both places
The Greek Septuagint reads ‘a hundred men’ in 1 Samuel 18:27 too, and Adam Clarke thought a hundred was therefore the original reading there. The Hebrew text reads two hundred, and the Greek may simply have brought the verse into line with verse 25 and 2 Samuel 3:14. On either reading the passages agree.
From the classic commentators
David had actually delivered to Saul as her dowry two hundred, but only one hundred had been requiredEllicott’s Commentary for English Readers, on 2 Samuel 3
Sources
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 2 Samuel 3 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers: 2 Samuel 3, at Bible Hub
- Adam Clarke, Commentary on 1 Samuel 18 (1810–1826), at Bible Hub
- The Septuagint (Brenton’s Greek text), 1 Samuel 18