Did the ships bring Solomon 420 talents of gold from Ophir or 450?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Hiram’s seamen sailed with Solomon’s men to Ophir “and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents”.
And Hiram sent in the navy his servants, shipmen that had knowledge of the sea, with the servants of Solomon. And they came to Ophir, and fetched from thence gold, four hundred and twenty talents, and brought it to king Solomon.
They went to Ophir “and took thence four hundred and fifty talents of gold, and brought them to king Solomon”.
And Huram sent him by the hands of his servants ships, and servants that had knowledge of the sea; and they went with the servants of Solomon to Ophir, and took thence four hundred and fifty talents of gold, and brought them to king Solomon.
The objection
Kings and Chronicles describe the same voyage of Solomon’s fleet, crewed by Hiram’s sailors, to Ophir. Kings says it brought back 420 talents of gold; Chronicles says 450. Both cannot be the amount brought to Solomon.
The answer
The two passages tell of the same voyage in almost the same words, and both say the gold was brought to king Solomon, so the most likely answer is that one figure was miscopied. Numbers suffer in hand-copying far more than words, because a number gives the copyist no sense to check it by. Here the two texts differ in a single place, twenty or fifty. Ellicott suggests that the Hebrew letters kaf (20) and nun (50) were confused; Barnes and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown also judge that one of the two texts has been miscopied. Haley lists this case among number differences that the copyist explanation accounts for simply.
The ancient versions show how easily such figures drifted. The Greek Septuagint has 450 in Chronicles, but ‘a hundred and twenty talents’ in 1 Kings 9:28, a third figure. Every other detail of the voyage agrees: the port at Ezion-geber, Hiram’s skilled seamen, the gold of Ophir.
Which figure is original cannot now be known. What the case shows is a slip of a scribe in one numeral, not two writers who disagreed about what happened.
Other answers Christians give
Gross and net
John Gill reports two older suggestions: that thirty talents went on the costs of the voyage or the wages of Hiram’s sailors, so that 450 were obtained and 420 reached the treasury; or (Grotius) that 450 talents of ore yielded 420 of refined gold. Both texts, however, say the gold was brought to Solomon, which makes these answers less likely.
Two voyages
Some have thought the passages describe different voyages. But they are told at the same point in Solomon’s story, with the same details, and read most naturally as one.
From the classic commentators
Talents, 420, 1 Kings ix. 28; 450, 2 Chron. viii. 18 ... In all these cases the hypothesis of copyist's errors affords a very facile and reasonable explanation.J. W. Haley, Alleged Discrepancies (1874), p. 383
Sources
- Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers: 2 Chronicles 8, at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 1 Kings 9 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- J. W. Haley, An Examination of the Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible (1874), p. 383
- The Septuagint in English, trans. L. C. L. Brenton (1851): 1 Kings 9, at eBible.org