Were the bronze pillars 18 cubits high or 35?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Hiram cast “two pillars of brass, of eighteen cubits high apiece”, each twelve cubits round.
For he cast two pillars of brass, of eighteen cubits high apiece: and a line of twelve cubits did compass either of them about.
Solomon made “two pillars of thirty and five cubits high”; the BSB renders it “two pillars, which together were thirty-five cubits high”.
Also he made before the house two pillars of thirty and five cubits high, and the chapiter that was on the top of each of them was five cubits.
Describing the pillars the Babylonians broke up: “the height of one pillar was eighteen cubits”.
And concerning the pillars, the height of one pillar was eighteen cubits; and a fillet of twelve cubits did compass it; and the thickness thereof was four fingers: it was hollow.
The objection
1 Kings 7:15 says each of the two bronze pillars before the temple was eighteen cubits high, and 2 Kings 25:17 and Jeremiah 52:21 agree. 2 Chronicles 3:15 gives the pillars thirty-five cubits, nearly twice as much. Both cannot be the height of the same pillars.
The answer
Chronicles does not give the same measurement as Kings. 1 Kings 7:15 gives each pillar’s height (Hebrew qomah, ‘height’), eighteen cubits “apiece”, and Jeremiah 52:21 speaks of “one pillar”. 2 Chronicles 3:15 gives a single figure for the two pillars together, and the word it uses is ’orek, ‘length’, not the qomah, ‘height’, of Kings. Read as it stands, the verse may give the length of the pair: thirty-five cubits of bronze pillar in all, seventeen and a half for each, which Kings, measuring one standing pillar, gives as a round eighteen. The BSB translates it this way, “which together were thirty-five cubits high”, and Haley mentions the idea that the bronze was cast as one long piece and then cut in two.
Many conservative scholars prefer another answer: that a copyist slipped. Keil and Delitzsch think the combined-length reading strained, and hold that ‘thirty-five’ arose from confusing two pairs of Hebrew number-letters: yod-heth (18) and lamed-he (35). On that view the true figure, eighteen, stands three times in Scripture, and the error came in only with the later copying of Chronicles.
Either way, the writers did not disagree about the pillars. One answer finds a different measurement; the other a slip in copying a single number.
Still open
Christian scholars are divided between the two main answers. Modern versions such as the BSB follow the combined-length reading, while Keil and Delitzsch thought it very improbable. The ancient Greek translation does not help it: the Septuagint renders 2 Chronicles 3:15 as a height, and in Jeremiah 52:21 it gives thirty-five cubits for one pillar. That shows the larger figure was known early, but not where it came from.
From the classic commentators
Pillars' length, 18 cubits, 1 Kings vii. 15; 35 cubits, 2 Chron. iii. 15 (possibly the two were cast in one piece 35 cubits long, which, cut in two, made two pillars, in round numbers 18 cubits long).J. W. Haley, Alleged Discrepancies (1874), p. 383
The number 35 evidently arose from confounding the numeral letters יח = 18 with לה = 35. The correctness of the number 18 is confirmed by Kg2 25:17 and Jer 52:21.Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on 1 Kings 7:15
Sources
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament: 1 Kings 7 (1857–78), at Bible Hub
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament: 2 Chronicles 3, at Bible Hub
- J. W. Haley, An Examination of the Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible (1874), p. 383
- The Septuagint in English, trans. L. C. L. Brenton (1851): Jeremiah 52, at eBible.org