Did Uzzah die at the threshing floor of Nachon or of Chidon?
Hard question · Israel’s history: Joshua to Esther · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
At Nachon’s threshing floor Uzzah took hold of the ark when the oxen stumbled; God struck him there, and David called the place Perez-uzzah.
And when they came to Nachon’s threshingfloor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God. And David was displeased, because the Lord had made a breach upon Uzzah: and he called the name of the place Perez–uzzah to this day.
The same event “unto the threshingfloor of Chidon”; the place is called Perez-uzza “to this day”.
And when they came unto the threshingfloor of Chidon, Uzza put forth his hand to hold the ark; for the oxen stumbled. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzza, and he smote him, because he put his hand to the ark: and there he died before God. And David was displeased, because the Lord had made a breach upon Uzza: wherefore that place is called Perez–uzza to this day.
The objection
Samuel and Chronicles tell the story of Uzzah’s death in almost the same words, yet name the place differently: the threshing floor of Nachon in 2 Samuel 6:6, and of Chidon in 1 Chronicles 13:9. Critics ask which is right.
The answer
The two books agree on where it happened and differ only in the name they give the spot. Places in Israel often had more than one name, and this one certainly did: both books add that it was afterwards called Perez-uzzah, ‘the breach of Uzzah’ (2 Samuel 6:8; 1 Chronicles 13:11). So in the writers’ own day it was known by at least two names.
Nachon and Chidon may be two names of the same owner or of the same place. Gill and Poole take it this way, and Gill reports a Jewish tradition that the place had two names. Keil and Delitzsch suggest that neither is the owner’s name. They take Nachon from the verb nakah, ‘to strike’, giving ‘the threshing floor of the stroke’, and Chidon from kid, ‘ruin’ or ‘destruction’ (the word in Job 21:20), giving ‘the threshing floor of disaster’. On that reading the floor was named after what happened there, Chronicles gives a word of the same meaning, and the name Perez-uzzah later replaced both. Either way the accounts describe one place and one event.
Other answers Christians give
‘The prepared floor’
The Aramaic Targum and the Greek translator Aquila took nachon as an ordinary word, ‘prepared’ or ‘fixed’, so that Uzzah died at ‘the prepared threshing floor’. On this view only Chronicles gives a proper name.
A copyist’s slip
Some, as the Pulpit Commentary allows and Tektonics argues, think that one form arose from the other in copying, since the ancient translations vary here. The Greek Septuagint of Samuel has ‘Nachor’, and its main text of Chronicles gives no name at all, only ‘the threshing floor’.
Still open
Nothing outside these verses tells us who Nachon or Chidon was, or where the threshing floor lay, and the classic commentators explain the names in different ways.
From the classic commentators
Chidon is probably only an explanation of nachon, so that the name may have been given to the threshing-floor, not from its owner, but from the incident connected with the ark which took place there.Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on 2 Samuel 6
Sources
- Keil & Delitzsch, Commentary on 2 Samuel 6, at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: 2 Samuel 6 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- The Pulpit Commentary: 1 Chronicles 13, at Bible Hub
- The Septuagint (Brenton’s Greek text), 2 Samuel 6