Should baptism be in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, or in the name of Jesus?
Hard question · Acts and the letters · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”.
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Peter at Pentecost: “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins”.
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
The Samaritans had been “baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus” but had not yet received the Holy Spirit.
(For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
Peter “commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord”: Cornelius and his household.
And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
Disciples at Ephesus who knew only John’s baptism heard Paul and “were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus”.
And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John’s baptism. Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
The objection
Jesus told his disciples to baptise “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”. Yet every time Acts describes a baptism, it is “in the name of Jesus Christ” or “of the Lord Jesus”. Either the apostles did not do what Jesus commanded, or Matthew and Acts disagree about how baptism should be done.
The answer
In these passages ‘in the name of’ describes what baptism means, not a form of words to be recited. To be baptised ‘into the name’ of someone was to be placed under his authority and to belong to him; Paul can even say that Israel was “baptized unto Moses” (1 Corinthians 10:2). Acts never tells us what words were spoken at any baptism. It tells us whose baptism it was. That is the point in Acts 19, where disciples who had known only “John’s baptism” were baptised “in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 19:3–5). The contrast is between John’s baptism and Christian baptism, not between two formulas.
Luke’s own wording shows that he is not quoting a set formula. He uses three different Greek prepositions: ‘into’ (eis) the name (8:16; 19:5), ‘in’ (en) the name (10:48), and in 2:38 ‘upon’ (epi) or ‘in’ (en), depending on the manuscript. A fixed form of words would not vary like that. Nor do the passages differ in substance. Matthew 28:19 speaks of one ‘name’ (onoma, singular) shared by Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Baptism in the name of Jesus is baptism into that name, since it is through Jesus that believers come to the Father and receive the Spirit, as Peter says in the same verse (Acts 2:38).
The earliest Christian church manual we have, the Didache, from the late first or early second century, uses both ways of speaking side by side. It tells churches to baptise ‘into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit’ (chapter 7), and then speaks of believers as those ‘baptized into the name of the Lord’ (chapter 9). To the early church the two expressions did not compete.
Other answers Christians give
The words used at baptism
Barnes and many others think that the apostles used Jesus’ own words from Matthew 28:19 when they baptised, and that Luke names Jesus because confessing him as Lord was what marked a person as a Christian.
Fitted to the hearers
Some point to the audiences. At Pentecost Peter spoke to Jews who already worshipped the God of Israel and knew of his Spirit; what they had to confess was Jesus, whom they had rejected. In Matthew 28 Jesus sends the disciples to the nations, who had to learn who the one God is.
Still open
Christians differ over whether the exact words spoken matter. Most churches baptise with the words of Matthew 28:19. Oneness Pentecostal churches baptise ‘in the name of Jesus’, holding that Jesus is the one name of Father, Son and Spirit. Since Acts records no words spoken at a baptism, the New Testament does not settle that debate directly.
From the classic commentators
It does not follow that, in administering the ordinance of baptism, they used only the name of Jesus Christ. It is much more probable that they used the form prescribed by the Saviour himself Matthew 28:19; though, as the special mark of a Christian is that he receives and honors Jesus Christ, this name is used here as implying the whole.Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on Acts 2:38 (1834)
But let no one eat or drink of your Thanksgiving (Eucharist), but they who have been baptized into the name of the LordThe Didache, chapter 9 (late first or early second century), trans. in Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 7 (1886)
Sources
- Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Acts 2 (1834), at Bible Hub
- The Didache (The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), chapters 7 and 9, at New Advent