Was the tax collector whom Jesus called named Matthew or Levi?
Hard question · The life of Jesus · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
Jesus sees “a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom”, and says, “Follow me”.
And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.
Jesus sees “Levi the son of Alpheus sitting at the receipt of custom”, and calls him.
And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alpheus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him.
Jesus sees “a publican, named Levi, sitting at the receipt of custom”, and calls him.
And after these things he went forth, and saw a publican, named Levi, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he said unto him, Follow me.
The objection
Matthew’s Gospel says that the tax collector whom Jesus called from his booth was named Matthew. Mark and Luke tell the same story but call him Levi. Critics ask which name is right.
The answer
Matthew and Levi are two names of one man. The three Gospels tell the same story at the same point in their narratives: Jesus passes by, sees a tax collector “sitting at the receipt of custom”, says “Follow me”, and he gets up and follows. Then comes a meal with many publicans and sinners, and the Pharisees’ complaint (Matthew 9:9–13; Mark 2:14–17; Luke 5:27–32). Mark calls him Levi the son of Alphaeus, and Luke simply Levi. Matthew’s Gospel calls him Matthew, and in its list of the Twelve adds “Matthew the publican” (Matthew 10:3). Mark and Luke also list a Matthew among the Twelve (Mark 3:18; Luke 6:15), but no Levi.
It was common for Jews of the time to have two names. Simon was also Cephas or Peter (John 1:42), Joseph was called Barnabas (Acts 4:36), Saul was also Paul (Acts 13:9), and John was also called Mark (Acts 12:12). Matthew is probably a short form of the Hebrew Mattithiah, ‘gift of the LORD’. Perhaps he took it, or was given it, when he became a disciple, as Simon was named Cephas, but the Gospels do not say. Barnes and Gill both take Levi and Matthew to be the same man, and Barnes notes that only Luke records that he “left all” to follow Jesus; Matthew does not say it of himself.
From the classic commentators
That it was the same man is known by the circumstances in which he was called being the same in all the evangelists, and by their all concurring in the statement that the Saviour was present at a feast soon after he called him, and by the fact that "Levi" is not mentioned in the catalogue of the apostles.Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on Matthew 9:9 (1832)
Sources
- Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Matthew 9 (1832), at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: Matthew 9 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- Strong’s Greek 3156: Matthaios, at Bible Hub