Bible Synapse

Did the centurion call Jesus the Son of God or a righteous man?

Hard question · The death and resurrection of Jesus · raised by 2 of the lists sceptics circulate

A summary and a fuller accountBoth true, in different senses
See the passages joined in the interactive map

The passages

Matthew 27:54

The centurion and those with him, seeing the earthquake, feared greatly and said, “Truly this was the Son of God.”

Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

Mark 15:39

Seeing how Jesus died, the centurion said, “Truly this man was the Son of God.”

And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God.

Luke 23:47

The centurion “glorified God, saying, Certainly this was a righteous man.”

Now when the centurion saw what was done, he glorified God, saying, Certainly this was a righteous man.

The objection

Matthew and Mark have the centurion at the cross say that Jesus was the Son of God. Luke has him say that Jesus was a righteous man. Critics ask which he actually said.

The answer

There is no reason to think the centurion said only one sentence. He watched Jesus die after three hours of darkness, followed by the earthquake (Matthew 27:45–54), and Matthew says that he and “they that were with him” spoke out in fear, so more than one soldier may have said more than one thing. Each Gospel records the words that suit its account.

Luke’s Gospel stresses again and again that Jesus was innocent: Pilate says three times that he finds no fault in him (Luke 23:4, 14, 22), Herod found nothing worthy of death (23:15), and the penitent thief says “this man hath done nothing amiss” (23:41). The centurion’s ‘righteous’ (dikaios) can mean ‘innocent’, and Luke makes his verdict the climax of that theme. Matthew and Mark give his confession that Jesus was ‘the Son of God’. The two belong together: Jesus had been condemned for claiming to be the Son of God (Matthew 27:43; John 19:7), so if he was righteous, his claim was true. A Roman soldier may have meant less by ‘son of God’ than a Christian reader would, but all three Gospels show the officer in charge of the execution concluding that Jesus was not what his accusers said. Gill puts both sayings together in just this way.

From the classic commentators

These things were said by "different persons," or at different periods of his sufferings - one evangelist having recorded one saying, and another another.Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on Matthew 27 (1832)
he glorified God; by confessing that Christ was the Son of God, and declaring him an innocent personJohn Gill, Exposition of the Bible, on Luke 23 (1746–1763)

Sources

Further reading

Raised by: Shabir Ally, 101 Clear Contradictions in the Bible, The Skeptic’s Annotated Bible. Only the verse references come from these lists.

Checked 2026-10-22. All hard questions