Bible Synapse

Is a person, such as Abraham or Rahab, justified by faith or by works?

Hard question · Salvation and the Christian life · raised by 4 of the lists sceptics circulate

The meaning of a wordRead in context
See the passages joined in the interactive map

The passages

Romans 3:28

Paul: a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Romans 4:2–3

Abraham was not justified by works; he believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness.

For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

James 2:21–24

James: Abraham was justified by works when he offered Isaac; by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

James 2:25

Rahab was justified by works when she received the messengers.

Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?

Hebrews 11:31

By faith Rahab did not perish with the unbelievers.

By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace.

The objection

Paul says “a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law” and that Abraham was not justified by works. James says Abraham was “justified by works” when he offered Isaac, that a man is justified “not by faith only”, and that Rahab too was justified by works, though Hebrews says she was saved by faith. These look like direct opposites.

The answer

Paul and James are answering different errors, and they use the key words in different senses. Paul opposes the idea that anyone can earn a right standing with God by keeping the law, ‘the deeds of the law’ such as circumcision. Against that he shows that Abraham “believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness” (Romans 4:3, quoting Genesis 15:6) before he was circumcised and many years before he offered Isaac. James opposes a ‘faith’ that is only a claim, words without deeds, which leaves the hungry hungry (James 2:14-16), the kind of belief the demons have, who “believe, and tremble” (2:19). Such faith, he says, is dead.

So when James says Abraham was justified by works “when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar”, he means that Abraham’s faith was shown to be real years after God had counted it as righteousness. James quotes the same verse as Paul and says that Abraham’s obedience fulfilled it: “by works was faith made perfect” (2:22-23). ‘Justify’ can mean to declare righteous, or to show to be righteous, as in “wisdom is justified of all her children” (Luke 7:35); Calvin put it that Paul speaks of righteousness reckoned before God, and James of righteousness shown in conduct. Paul agrees that real faith works: what counts is “faith which worketh by love” (Galatians 5:6), and believers are “created in Christ Jesus unto good works” (Ephesians 2:10). Rahab is the same case. Hebrews names the faith and James the deed that showed it, and both speak of one act, her receiving the spies.

Other answers Christians give

Faith alone

Lutheran and Reformed Christians hold that a sinner is justified before God by faith alone, through Christ’s righteousness credited to him. Good works are the necessary fruit and evidence of that faith, as James insists, but add nothing to justification itself.

Faith working with works

The Council of Trent (1547) taught that no one earns the grace of first justification, by faith or by works, but that the justified, ‘faith co-operating with good works’, grow in righteousness and are further justified; it cites James 2:24. Catholics therefore read James as speaking of justification in its full, lifelong sense.

Still open

The main Christian traditions all hold that Paul and James do not contradict each other, but how faith, works and justification fit together has been debated since the Reformation, and it still divides Protestants and Catholics.

From the classic commentators

Paul means by it the gratuitous imputation of righteousness before the tribunal of God; and James, the manifestation of righteousness by the conduct, and that before menJohn Calvin, Commentary on James 2, at Bible Hub
the Holy Spirit by him combats not Paul, but those who abuse Paul's doctrine. The teaching of both alike is inspired, and is therefore to be received without wresting of words; but each has a different class to deal withJamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary on James 2 (1871), at Bible Hub

Sources

Further reading

Raised by: W. H. Burr, Self-Contradictions of the Bible (1860), Bart D. Ehrman, Jesus, Interrupted (2009), EvilBible.com, The Skeptic’s Annotated Bible. Only the verse references come from these lists.

Checked 2026-10-22. All hard questions