Did both men crucified with Jesus mock him, or only one?
Hard question · The death and resurrection of Jesus · raised by 5 of the lists sceptics circulate
See the passages joined in the interactive mapThe passages
“The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.”
The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.
“And they that were crucified with him reviled him.”
Let Christ the King of Israel descend now from the cross, that we may see and believe. And they that were crucified with him reviled him.
One malefactor railed on Jesus; the other rebuked him, asked Jesus to remember him, and was promised paradise.
And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on him, saying, If thou be Christ, save thyself and us. But the other answering rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss. And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
The objection
Matthew and Mark say that the two men crucified with Jesus both reviled him. Luke says that only one did, while the other rebuked his companion, defended Jesus and asked to be remembered in his kingdom.
The answer
Jesus hung on the cross for several hours, until the ninth hour (Mark 15:34), and much could change in that time. Matthew and Mark describe the early part of it, when passers-by and the chief priests and scribes all joined in the mockery (Matthew 27:39–43; Mark 15:29–31). Both use the Greek imperfect ōneidizon, ‘they were reproaching him’, which describes what was going on at that stage, not necessarily until the end.
Luke describes a later moment, when one of the two had stopped and turned on his companion: “Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?” (Luke 23:40). So both accounts can be true. At first both men joined in the abuse; later one of them, having watched how Jesus suffered and heard him pray “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34), changed his mind. Barnes gives this explanation, and Gill allows it.
Other answers Christians give
A plural for a singular
Augustine, and later Gill, suggested that Matthew and Mark, telling the story briefly, used the plural ‘the thieves’ where only one of them spoke, a common way of speaking. Augustine compared Hebrews 11:33, where ‘they’ stopped the mouths of lions, though Daniel alone is meant.
Still open
Some early manuscripts, among them Codex Vaticanus and Codex Bezae, lack the prayer “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34), though most have it. The explanation above does not rest on that one saying: the penitent thief had watched all that Jesus said and suffered on the cross.
From the classic commentators
The account in Luke may, however, easily be reconciled with that in Matthew by supposing that "at first both" of them reviled the Saviour, and that it is of this fact that Matthew speaks. Afterward one of them relented and became penitent perhaps from witnessing the patient sufferings of Christ.Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible, on Matthew 27 (1832)
Sources
- Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Matthew 27 (1832), at Bible Hub
- John Gill, Exposition of the Bible: Matthew 27 (1746–1763), at Bible Hub
- Augustine, The Harmony of the Gospels, Book III, chapter 16 (about 400), at New Advent
- Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges: Luke 23, at Bible Hub