Bible Synapse

Which son of Zerubbabel was Jesus’ ancestor: Abiud, Rhesa, or one of the sons named in Chronicles?

Hard question · Genealogies · raised by 1 of the lists sceptics circulate

Both true, in different sensesDifferent people, or one person with two names
See the passages joined in the interactive map

The passages

Matthew 1:13

“Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor”.

And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

Luke 3:27

Luke’s line: Joanna, son of Rhesa, son of Zorobabel, son of Salathiel.

Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,

1 Chronicles 3:19–20

Zerubbabel’s children: Meshullam, Hananiah and their sister Shelomith, and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed.

And the sons of Pedaiah were, Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister: And Hashubah, and Ohel, and Berechiah, and Hasadiah, Jushab–hesed, five.

The objection

Matthew says Zerubbabel’s son was Abiud; Luke says it was Rhesa. 1 Chronicles 3:19–20, which lists Zerubbabel’s children, names neither of them: his sons there are Meshullam, Hananiah, Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed. Critics ask which, if any, is right.

The answer

Zerubbabel had at least seven sons (1 Chronicles 3:19–20), so there is nothing strange in two family lines coming down from him through different sons, just as Matthew and Luke trace David’s line through two different sons, Solomon and Nathan. Neither Gospel says that Zerubbabel had only one son.

That Abiud and Rhesa are missing from Chronicles is less of a difficulty than it looks. Men in Israel often had more than one name, and the same king is Jehoiachin in 2 Kings 24:8 and Jeconiah in 1 Chronicles 3:16. Genealogies also skip generations: Matthew leaves out three kings between Joram and Ozias (Matthew 1:8), so his ‘Zorobabel begat Abiud’ may mean that Abiud was a later descendant. Luke’s Rhesa may not be a personal name at all. Rēšāʾ is Aramaic for ‘the head’, and some older scholars took it as a title, ‘Zerubbabel the prince’; Smith’s Bible Dictionary records the conjecture that Rhesa ‘is no person, but merely a title’. Then Joanan, the name before Rhesa in Luke’s list, was Zerubbabel’s son, and Smith’s and Easton’s Bible dictionaries identify him with Hananiah. Joanan (Yo-hanan, ‘the LORD is gracious’) is Hananiah (Hanan-yah) with the same two parts reversed, just as Jehoiachin (Yeho-yachin) is Jeconiah (Yechon-yah). Hananiah is one of the sons listed in 1 Chronicles 3:19. These identifications are suggestions, but they show how the three lists can fit together.

Other answers Christians give

Two different Zerubbabels

Some, among them the bible.ca answer to Shabir Ally (see further reading), hold that Luke’s Shealtiel and Zerubbabel are different men from Matthew’s, with the same common names. On that view their sons would of course differ, and the Zerubbabel of Chronicles could be either of them, or a third man.

Abiud as Meshullam

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia suggested that Abiud, ‘father of Hud’, was a later name of Meshullam, Zerubbabel’s eldest son, taken after the birth of a son named Hud, and that ‘Rhesa’ was his title as head of the exiles. Adam Clarke, more simply, took Abiud to be the eldest son and Rhesa the youngest.

Still open

No ancient source says which of Zerubbabel’s sons Matthew’s Abiud and Luke’s Rhesa (or Joanan) were, and Christian scholars hold the identifications above loosely. Whether Rhesa is a name or a title is also debated.

Sources

Further reading

Raised by: Shabir Ally, 101 Clear Contradictions in the Bible. Only the verse references come from these lists.

Checked 2026-10-22. All hard questions